The fact that the MFT on the short end cameras like "improve" something the lens geometry is expected to by now 'have rumgesprochen. But because the cameras do it so quite effectively, which is actually rarely an issue. Just the users that include the noise of each individual pixel with a magnifying glass, are very tolerant of digital lens corrections.
I have a different attitude and'm perhaps a bit critical, I'll admit. In any case, I have released all three times mZuiko 14-42 and 7-14 at the Panasonic an early work of mine, where I was, however, too lazy, it auszurahmen - because the framework is also a welcome edge straight.
The pictures are as usual with Picasa developed from the RAW - Picasa has the advantage that the image geometry is not to handle and process all the RAW, and the edge that is cut off from the "better" always converters. The keystone I beg to ignore. Obviously I have the camera focused 100% parallel. Of course I could take pictures and graph paper - but it is boring. The above image is from 7-14 at 14mm - corrected clean because I can only say a little cushion, but nothing dramatic. We can live with it.
this is the much-maligned "old" 14-42, loud, slow, "wobbly" and what the attributes are not everything. Clear: a clearly visible ton (I've already demonstrated Auschwitz in various publications).
And this is the "New" 14-42. silent, fast, significant manufactured - but unfortunately, with significantly greater tonne - about the same level of 14-140 from Panasonic. And
Tadaaa: now the Rolls Royce of MFT lenses: the 7-14 at 7 mm:
No, I have not mistaken, the picture is not from the 8mm fisheye, the thing is sold by Panasonic as auskorrigiertes ultra wide angle for more than 1250 € EIA. However, to save the honor of the lens: It is at the short end, only slightly worse than the old 14-42 ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment