Sun - It took a two days, in which I had pen and the troubled E-5 with all sorts of exotic lenses.
Among other things, with a 35-100. Objective: to say how you think's the picture quality?
First we went to the dynamic range. There was not even the big surprises:
E-P2: 9.5 aperture
E-PL1 and PL2-E: 10 f
E-5: 10,5 Aperture
But after a few inquiries on oly-oly e.de and -forum I once hung different lenses on the E-5 and then measured the dynamics. The astonishing result: the dynamics differs considerably depending on the lens. And, for more accurate measurements: even according to the selected aperture. reached with the Sigma 50-500 E-5 with just 9.5 aperture diaphragm dynamics, with the 50-200 was not at f/5.6 at 10.5 final. (Only my Messafubau could not.) At f 10 the Sigma then reached after all, nearly 10 light values dynamics. So we are finally connected to the sensor technology to the point that the sensor is not limited, but essentially the optics. Therefore, the large pipe on the E-PL2.
When testing the resolution then I do because it's jaw 'fell off. E-PL1, PL2 and E-E-5 are almost on par with the bare resolution. The differences are negligible. With a little good will can attest to the E-5 still a little kick more brilliance, as in the lines is still a bit more definition - in daily operation that plays a role but hardly likely. The P2 E-lose much. All tests were carried out with the 35-100, was on the PENs manually focused with viewfinder and keep the setting for all pens, the E-5 could focus by AF.
So in the forums is complaining big: they all want the image quality of the E-5 to Entry-level price. Here you go: Now.
0 comments:
Post a Comment